“We Shouldn’t Have Assault Weapons Available”

A top White House advisor lays out Obama’s new line on gun control.

White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett speaks with retired judge LaDoris Cordell at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco. Courtesy of <a href=http://www.nortonbasu.com/>Norton Basu</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It’s all Democratic hands on deck in the gun control fight.

As House Democrats staged a sit-in on the House floor Wednesday evening, White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett did her part in an appearance before San Francisco’s Commonwealth Club.

“It’s our view that we shouldn’t have assault weapons available,” she said. “They’re really dangerous. They really are common-sense reforms that we’ve been asking for.”

Beyond pushing the White House’s goal of banning assault weapons, Jarrett urged expanding background checks and encouraged people make their voices heard.* She lauded Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) for initiating the sit-in.

“He has just had enough, and he doesn’t know what else to do other than just sit there and demonstrate until he can get his colleagues on the Republican side of the House to come and just do their jobs,” she said.

Since the mass shooting in Orlando, legislators supporting gun-control have been busy. It started last week when Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) filibustered the Senate for almost 15 hours and demanded a vote on gun-control legislation. That brought votes on four proposals in a special Senate session Monday night, but the measures failed.

Then, Rep. Lewis led a sit-in on Wednesday, demanding a vote on a bill that would prevent people on a no-fly targeting terrorists list from purchasing firearms. “Sometimes you have to do something out of the ordinary; sometimes you have to make a way out of no way,” Lewis said. “We have been too quiet for too long.”

Earlier this week, Jarrett hosted a conference call with signers of a White House petition to ban the AR-15 and outlined several other administration initiatives, including looking into smart gun technology and funding research on gun homicides by the Centers for Disease Control. (An NRA-backed measure banned federal funding for such research in the 1990s.)

On Wednesday night Jarrett said it will take a lot for gun control advocates to beat the NRA.

“They have a lot of money and a lot of influence, and the only thing that’s going to be a counterbalance to that is truly you; it’s the American people,” Jarrett said. “When you care as much about keeping our children safe as the NRA does about making weapons available to every single person, that’s when change will happen.”

Clarification: While Jarrett noted people are encouraging their elected officials, she did not specifically urge them to do so.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate