After Immigration Deadlock, Obama Slams Republican Refusal to Confirm SCOTUS Nominee

The Supreme Court’s 4-4 tie leaves the president’s immigration plan blocked.


President Barack Obama sharply criticized Republicans in Congress on Thursday for “willfully” preventing the Supreme Court from functioning properly, effectively placing the blame for the deadlock in a high-stakes immigration case, United States v. Texas, on their refusal to confirm his Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.

“Today, the Supreme Court was unable to reach a decision,” Obama said in a press conference from the White House. “This is a part of the consequence of the Republican failure so far to give  a fair hearing to Mr. Merrick Garland.”

“Today’s situation underscores the degree to which the court is not able to function the way it’s supposed to,” he continued. “The court’s inability to reach a decision in this case is a very clear reminder of why it’s so important for the Supreme Court  to have a full bench.”

Shortly before the president’s remarks, the Supreme Court announced that it could not reach a decision in the case, which challenged the president’s executive action to protect nearly 4 million undocumented immigrants from the threat of deportation and allow them to legally obtain work in the United States. The tie upholds a lower court’s ruling that prevent Obama’s plan from taking effect.

“Today’s decision is frustrating to those who seek to grow our economy and bring a rationality to our immigration system and to allow people to come out of the shadows who are left with a perpetual shadows on them.”

Obama said that the tie took “us further from the country we aspire to be.” He also pointed to the upcoming general election as a choice Americans can make on delivering progress to a broken immigration system.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate