Former National Security Officials Blast Trump’s Russian Hacking Comments

“Shocking and dangerous,” says one former admiral.

Former CIA and NSA director Michael Hayden criticizd Trump's remarks.Luis M. Alvarez/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


After Donald Trump appeared to invite Russian hackers to retrieve emails deleted by Hillary Clinton, former national security officials are blasting Trump for seemingly encouraging spying by a foreign government.

At a press conference in Miami on Wednesday, the Republican presidential nominee said he hoped Russian hackers would try to dig up Clinton’s deleted emails. The Clinton campaign quickly slammed Trump for the comments, saying in a statement, “This has the be the first time that a major presidential candidate has actively encouraged a foreign power to conduct espionage against his political opponent.” It didn’t take long for major players in the national security sphere to join in.

  • Gen. Michael Hayden, the former director of both the CIA and the National Security Agency, criticized Trump in comments to Bloomberg‘s Eli Lake.

  • Adm. James Stavridis, who was once the highest-ranking officer in the Navy and was briefly mentioned as a possible vice presidential pick for Clinton, called Trump’s comments “shocking and dangerous” in an interview with the Guardian. “In addition to the obvious domestic political implications of essentially inviting interference in our election, they will further undermine European confidence in the reliability of the US as an ally—particularly in the face of Russian adventurism,” he said.
  • Former CIA director and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta expressed shock at Trump’s statements. “I find those kinds of statements to be totally outrageous,” he told CNN.

  • Mike Vickers, a well-known former CIA officer and Pentagon official, wrote a column for Politico Magazine that dismantled all aspects of Trump’s foreign policy. “America today faces three principal national security threats,” Vickers wrote, “from radical Islamists, who seek to terrorize Americans and overthrow the existing order in the Middle East; from a resurgent Russia, which seeks to reassert its dominance over the former Soviet Empire and overthrow the existing order in Europe; and from a rising China, which seeks suzerainty in Asia. In all three areas, Trump has shown a limited grasp of the nature of the threat and has proposed strategies that would make America less secure.”

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate