Ivanka Trump Shuts Down in the Face of Basic Questions From Cosmopolitan Magazine

“I think that you have a lot of negativity in these questions.”

Evan Vucci/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The media have recently come under fire for treating Donald Trump with kid gloves, particularly after Matt Lauer last week failed to press Trump on his false claims. But apparently Trump’s daughter Ivanka thinks the press is being too harsh—at least when it comes to that hard-hitting, tough-as-nails outlet called Cosmopolitan magazine.

On Wednesday, Cosmopolitan interviewed Ivanka Trump about her father’s new child care policy. She is considered the force behind the new policy; she helped introduce it alongside her father this week and is publicizing it. But when she was asked a few basic questions about the policy, the interview went off the rails.

The tensions began when reporter Prachi Gupta asked some simple questions about whether fathers and same-sex couples would be eligible for benefits under the plan’s maternity leave policy. Trump clearly didn’t appreciate this line of questioning and provided cryptic answers, saying, “The original intention of the plan is to help mothers in recovery in the immediate aftermath of childbirth.”

But it was a question about her father’s comment from 2004 that pregnancy is “an inconvenience for a business” that pushed Trump over the edge. Gupta gently offered her an opportunity to address those comments, telling her, “Talk a little bit about those comments, and perhaps what has changed.”

First, Trump responded in anger, threatening to walk away from the interview. “So I think that you have a lot of negativity in these questions,” she said. “I think my father has put forth a very comprehensive and really revolutionary plan to deal with a lot of issues. So I don’t know how useful it is to spend too much time with you on this if you’re going to make a comment like that.” (It’s true that many Republicans have not gone as far as Trump does in his new policy on issues like paid maternity leave and child care. Still, Hillary Clinton put forward a more aggressive plan months ago, a fact Trump refuses to acknowledge.)

Next came denial. After Gupta pointed out that she was simply presenting a statement that the presidential candidate had made, Trump acted as if those comments never took place. “Well, you said he made those comments,” she said. “I don’t know that he said those comments.”

Finally, Trump was able to return to the topic of the plan. After Gupta pointed out that she had been quoting an NBC interview transcript, Trump turned back to the plan by denying that anyone besides her father even had a plan. “There’s plenty of time for you to editorialize around this, but I think he put forth a really incredible plan that has pushed the boundaries of what anyone else is talking about,” she said. “On child care specifically, there are no proposals on the table.” This is, of course, not true.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate