North Carolina GOP Goes Nuclear on the NCAA Over Bathroom Bill Response

“I wish the NCAA was this concerned about the women who were raped at Baylor.”

Jacob Kupferman/CSM/ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Update 9/14/16, 1:46 p.m.: The Atlantic Coast Conference on Wednesday announced it would pull all championships from North Carolina for the 2016-17 academic year over the state’s bathroom bill.

Tensions over North Carolina’s infamous “bathroom bill” exploded on Monday, as the NCAA announced it would move seven championship events out of the state and the North Carolina Republican Party responded by accusing the collegiate sports association of “political peacocking” and endangering women.

Gov. Pat McCrory signed the sweeping anti-LGBT bill, known as HB2, into law in March. The measure strips workplace discrimination protections from the state’s workers and requires transgender people to use bathrooms corresponding to their biological sex, not their gender identity. In response, the National Basketball Association announced in July that it was relocating its annual All-Star Game from Charlotte to New Orleans, costing Charlotte an estimated $100 million in economic benefits. Businesses from PayPal to Deutsche Bank have called off expansion plans in the state, and musicians, including Bruce Springsteen, have canceled shows in protest.

On Monday, the NCAA announced it would move its March basketball tournament and six other championship events from the state “because of the cumulative actions taken by the state concerning civil rights protections.”

The North Carolina Republican Party responded swiftly and fiercely, defending the law in an incisive rebuke of the NCAA for “political peacocking.” In a statement, state GOP spokesperson Kami Mueller said:

This is so absurd it’s almost comical. I genuinely look forward to the NCAA merging all men’s and women’s teams together as singular, unified, unisex teams. Under the NCAA’s logic, colleges should make cheerleaders and football players share bathrooms, showers and hotel rooms. This decision is an assault to female athletes across the nation. If you are unwilling to have women’s bathrooms and locker rooms, how do you have a women’s team? I wish the NCAA was this concerned about the women who were raped at Baylor. Perhaps the NCAA should stop with their political peacocking and instead focus their energies on making sure our nation’s collegiate athletes are safe, both on and off the field.

In the hours following the NCAA’s decision, McCrory did not issue a public statement.

In explaining its decision, the NCAA’s board of governors noted that the state law offered protections for public officials to “deny services to the LGBT community.” It pointed out that five states had banned public employees and “representatives of public institutions” from traveling to North Carolina in response to the law, and that in July, the University of Albany announced it had canceled a November 12 game against Duke University following an executive order signed by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo that barred travel to North Carolina. At the time, Duke head coach Mike Krzyzewski called the North Carolina law “embarrassing.”  

“Fairness is about more than the opportunity to participate in college sports, or even compete for championships,” said NCAA President Mark Emmert in a press release. “We believe in providing a safe and respectful environment at our events and are committed to providing the best experience possible for college athletes, fans and everyone taking part in our championships.” In an interview with CBS on Tuesday, Emmert called the decision to move a “no-brainer.” When asked about Mueller’s comments regarding the association’s handling of sexual assaults, Emmert said, “The two issues are completely unrelated. The HB2 decision is one that engenders opinions on both sides of the aisle. It’s a political season. That’s unfortunate, and people are going to have these types of comments.”

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate