Who’s the Russian Ambassador at the Center of Two Trump Administration Scandals?

Sergey Kislyak’s name keeps coming up.

Cliff Owen/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Wait, where have I heard the name Sergey Kislyak before?

Sergey Kislyak is Russia’s ambassador to the United States, who has served as a key link between his country and Donald Trump’s camp. Conversations with Kislyak have ensnared two Trump appointees—former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and Attorney General Jeff Sessions—in scandal. Flynn resigned after it came to light he lied about having discussed US sanctions against Russia with the ambassador before Trump took office. Their conversations took place as the Obama administration decided to impose new sanctions as a result of the country’s interference in the 2016 elections. Now Sessions, too, is caught up with Kislyak. At his confirmation hearing, Session claimed he “did not have communications with the Russians” during Trump’s campaign, but on Thursday, the Washington Post reported that he actually met with Kislyak twice. Democrats called for the attorney general to resign, and several congressional republicans said he should recuse himself from any investigation into improper contact between Russia and the Trump campaign. Sessions called a press conference late on Thursday to announce he would step back from any relevant investigations.

So who is Kislyak anyway?

For the last nine years, Kislyak has served as Russia’s ambassador to the United States, an unusually long stint, according to CNN. Before becoming an ambassador, he served as Russia’s deputy minister of foreign affairs, where he helped negotiate international arms control agreements. Kislyak  reportedly first joined the Soviet Foreign Ministry in 1977 after graduating from the Moscow Engineering Physics Institute.

I heard something about Kislyak being a Russian spy. Is that true?

Maybe? According to CNN, Kislyak has been described by current and former US intelligence officials as a top spy and spy recruiter. A Russian government spokesperson dismissed the allegations, describing them as “depersonalized assumptions of the media that are constantly trying to blow this situation out of proportion.”

What does Kislyak think about the United States?

Back in October, Kislyak told the Detroit Economic Club that Russia had “become collateral damage in the fight between the two parties here.” The next month he said the two countries were “living through the worst time in our relationship,” a curious claim considering mutually assured destruction doesn’t seem to be on the table. Here’s an interesting tidbit from a State Department cable released by WikiLeaks: After meetings with a handful of Russian officials in 2007, including Kislyak, an Israeli official came away with the view that “Russia hates the U.S., wants to become an empire again, and feels empowered because of its oil.” The Israeli reported that the Russians he met with “see cooperation with the U.S. as endangering their own strategic interests.”

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate