Here’s the Democrats’ Best Case for a Trump-Russia Investigation

The top Democrat on the intelligence committee lays out the timeline of Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.)Aaron P. Bernstein/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


At the start of Monday’s hearing on Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the House intelligence committee, laid out why the hearing was so important.

Schiff, a former federal prosecutor, offered a detailed timeline of Russia’s role in the election during a 15-minute opening statement ahead of the committee’s questioning of FBI Director James Comey and National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers. The American public will never know whether Russian meddling swung the election, Schiff said, but there are some things that are known that deserve further exploration.

“What was happening in July/August of last year? And were US persons involved?”

“We do know this: The months of July and August 2016 appear to have been pivotal,” Schiff said. “It was at this time that the Russians began using the information they had stolen to help Donald Trump and harm Hillary Clinton. And so the question is why? What was happening in July/August of last year? And were US persons involved?”

Schiff laid out details from the series of memos authored by a former Western intelligence operative detailing possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence. He highlighted the behavior of former Trump campaign national security adviser Carter Page, who reportedly traveled to Moscow on what Schiff described as a “trip approved by the Trump campaign” and met with the CEO of a Russian corporation who is reportedly a “former KGB agent and close friend” of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Schiff also pointed to allegations in the memos that the Trump campaign was offered documents damaging to Hillary Clinton in exchange for, as Schiff put it, “a Trump Administration policy that de-emphasizes Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and instead focuses on NATO countries not paying their fair share—policies which, even as recently as the President’s meeting last week with Angela Merkel, have now presciently come to pass.” 

Prior to the hearing, Trump tweeted that allegations that his campaign colluded with Russian officials are “FAKE NEWS” and that Democrats “made up and pushed the Russian story as an excuse for running a terrible campaign.”

Schiff closed his statement by pointing out why the Congress must thoroughly investigate Russian interference in the election. “Only by understanding what the Russians did can we inoculate ourselves from the further Russian interference we know is coming,” Schiff said. “Only then can we help protect our European allies who are, as we speak, enduring similar Russian interference in their own elections.”

Read the full statement below:

 

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate