Senate Republicans Really, Really Don’t Want to Talk About Trump Jr.

No really.

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom via ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Donald Trump Jr. provided some fire to go with all the smoke over possible Trump campaign collusion with Russia, but Senate Republicans aren’t rushing to the alarms.

With his hand forced by the New York Times, Tuesday morning President Trump’s eldest son released emails showing that he enthusiastically sought help from the Russian government in obtaining information he hoped would be damaging to Hillary Clinton. The bombshell contradicted months of denials by the president and his surrogates that his campaign communicated with Russians as part of a coordinated effort to defeat Clinton, and also junked a longstanding claim by Trump backers that there is zero evidence of collusion between the parties in question.

Instead of outrage, though, GOP senators communicated a clear desire to avoid opining on the revelations.

In his weekly pen and pad session with reporters, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) declined to comment on the Donald Jr. news, beyond asserting confidence that the Senate Intelligence Committee will “get to bottom of it.”

Earlier Tuesday, that committee’s chairman, Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), was asked if his panel will in fact “get to the bottom of this.” Burr’s response was a bit more qualified, telling reporters, “We said we were going to get to the bottom of the investigation.”

Burr also warned against “forming a conclusion based on one email release.”

Even some of the president’s least stalwart GOP allies seemed keen to avoid judgement. “I haven’t read the emails,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told reporters. “I don’t know [much] other than what’s been reported in the press. I imagine the Intelligence Committee will look at that as part of an overall process.”

Responding to a question about whether or not the emails show an effort to collude with the Kremlin, Rubio sidestepped. “That’s something Mr. Mueller will have to determine,” he said, referencing Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his Justice Department investigation into Russian interference. 

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who heads a Senate Judiciary subcommittee that has looked into issues related to Russian election meddling, called it “problematic” that Trump Jr., the president’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, and former campaign chief Paul Manafort attended a Trump Tower meeting with a Kremlin-connected lawyer who was supposedly going to provide dirt on Clinton. But Graham noted it did not appear that the Trump campaign actually received Russian aid as a result of this meeting. According to US intelligence agencies, of course, the Russians did provide assistance after the meeting, by releasing embarrassing emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign.

Asked by Mother Jones if that was a coincidence, Graham responded, “I don’t know. I know that lady didn’t help them.”

Meanwhile, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), a Senate Intelligence Committee member who has previously pressed fellow Republicans to investigate Russian meddling more aggressively, struck a similar note. Collins said “it would premature to judge” whether the Trump campaign tried to collude, but that the committee should interview Trump Jr. and others involved in the Trump Tower meeting. “We’re still in the early stages of this investigation,” Collins said.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), meanwhile, tried to completely avoid the topic. Corker was eager to discuss the progress of legislation he’s been pushing that would impose new sanctions on Russia for interfering in US politics, and he suggested the new evidence of Moscow’s activities in the 2016 election were an unsubstantial matter outside his lane. “Talk to others about politics,” Corker said. “Talk to me about policy.” 

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate