House Democrats Call for Investigation of Trump’s Puerto Rico Response

They want an oversight committee hearing on how Trump is handling Hurricane Maria recovery.

Carol Guzy/ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Two Democrats on the House oversight committee are calling for an investigation into the Trump administration’s response to the hurricane in Puerto Rico. On Friday, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the committee, and Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-Virgin Islands) issued a letter to Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), chairman of the committee, saying the response is in need of “robust oversight.” The Democrats demanded that Gowdy convene an emergency oversight hearing next week.

“Urgent action by our Committee now could help accelerate the federal response to the devastation in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and make a measurable and significant difference in the lives of American families there,” the letter says. “Oversight now also could help prevent a worsening of the human tragedy that is unfolding and could help ensure that the lessons our Committee identified from past federal responses are implemented by the Trump Administration.”

The Trump administration is facing mounting pressure from aid workers, politicians, and Puerto Ricans for what’s being described as a slow and inadequate response to Hurricane Maria, which hit the island nine days ago. The Category 4 storm devastated the island, dumping more than two feet of rain on some areas with 150 mph winds, which knocked out nearly all the electricity on the island and decimated 80 percent of crops. Restoring electricity is expected to take months, which will significantly exacerbate the island’s drinking water crisis.

Despite the dismal conditions, critics note that Trump moved slowly on temporarily lifting a law that requires goods shipped between US ports to travel on ships built in the states with US crews, which aid workers pointed out was one of the biggest obstacles to getting the island quick relief in the wake of the storm. Even so, the Trump administration has been playing up its response to the storm and the president blamed the media for treating him unfairly. 

Trump’s not the only one talking up the administration’s response. Acting Homeland Security Secretary Elaine Duke described the administration’s response as a “really a good news story.” The Mayor of San Juan, Carmen Yulin Cruz, dismissed that claim on CNN. “When you are drinking from a creek it’s not a good news story,” she said. “When you don’t have food for a baby, it’s not a good news story.” At least 16 people have been confirmed dead from the storm, but experts say the death toll is likely higher. 

In their letter, Cummings and Plaskett argue the dire situation on the island and evidence of a lackluster response necessitates an immediate investigation.

“The full Committee currently has no hearings, business meetings, or other activities scheduled for the entire week, and this issue is in desperate need of rapid and robust oversight,” the letter reads.  “Millions of American citizens residing in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are facing massive calamities—including widespread disease and death—and we need to help them now.”



We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate