Donald Trump Is Either Lying or Using a Terrible Accountant

The president says the tax cuts are bad for rich people. In reality, Trump himself is the big winner.

President Donald Trump gives a speech about taxes in Indianapolis in September. Michael Conroy/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump told a group of Democratic Senators: “My accountant called me and said ‘you’re going to get killed in this [tax] bill,” NBC News reported. If true, Trump has managed to hire a spectacularly incompetent accountant. Another possibility is that Trump is lying.

There’s a lot we don’t know about Trump’s finances. Trump broke from more than 30-years of precedent by refusing to release any of his tax returns during last year’s presidential campaign. But thanks to a leaked portion of Trump’s 2005 tax return and a 2016 letter from his tax lawyers, it’s clear that Trump is likely to be one of the biggest winners under Republicans’ plan. It’s not for nothing that New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote last week that you “won’t go far wrong if you think of the big tax cuts in the law as having been custom designed to benefit the Trump family.”

Trump’s tax plan would benefit him in three major ways. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act introduced by House Republicans eliminates the Alternative Minimum Tax, which cost the president $31 million in 2005. It cuts income taxes for the types of businesses—known as “pass-throughs”—that Trump favors from 39.6 percent to 25 percent. And, most importantly, it gets rid of taxes on inherited wealth. A rough calculation shows that could give his children $620 million.

Trump also claimed he would be a “big loser” under his tax cut, according to the Washington Post. “The deal is so bad for rich people, I had to throw in the estate tax just to give them something,” he said. That is not true. The left-leaning Institute on Taxation on Economic Policy finds that the top 1 percent of Americans would get a tax break of nearly $50,000 next year as a result of the House bill. The working class would receive $360 on average.

And as Jonathan Chait writes for New York, Congress’ nonpartisan tax committee does not include the estate tax in its projections. The committee still finds that two-thirds of taxpayers who make more than $1 million per year would get at least $500 from the Republican bill in 2027, compared to 5 percent of people who make between $30,000 and $40,000 per year. Overall, more than half of taxpayers—including about 40 percent of the middle class—would either pay more taxes or get less than $100 in 2027 as a result of House Republicans’ tax plan.

It is theoretically possible that Trump would pay more taxes under his plan, but all the evidence suggests otherwise. The only way to know for sure is for Trump to release his tax returns.

 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate