December 22, 2017

Republicans Quietly Warn Trump: Don’t Fire Mueller

“It wouldn’t be a good idea.”

Robert Mueller leaves the Capitol building after meeting with the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill, June 21, 2017.Ting Shen/Xinhua via ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

With members of Congress headed home for the holidays, Washington is bracing for the possibility that President Donald Trump will attempt to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, despite assertions by Trump and his allies that he has no plans to do so. More than 170 House Democrats signed a letter supporting Mueller this week, and Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, took to the floor of the Senate on Wednesday to warn that ousting the special counsel could spark a constitutional crisis.

“Congress must make clear to the President that the firing of the Special Counsel or interfering in his investigation by issuing pardons of essential witnesses is unacceptable and would have immediate and significant consequences,” he said.

Republicans haven’t raced to take up Warner’s call, but some are quietly warning against messing with Mueller.

“He’s the best hope for giving us a product that the largest number of Americans can accept as credible,” Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), who as chairman of the House Oversight Committee has worked to investigate matters Democrats deride as distractions from the Trump-Russia scandal, told Mother Jones this week.

Republican senators, in particular, largely say they oppose any bid to oust Mueller. Since Mueller’s May appointment, which came after Trump fired former FBI Director James Comey, dozens of GOP senators have said he should be allowed to carry out his investigation, according to a tally by Think Progress and other reports. In interviews this week with Mother Jones, Republicans who do not appear to have commented publicly on the probe warned Trump against attempting to sack Mueller.

“He shouldn’t,” said Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming.

“It wouldn’t be a good idea to fire him,” said Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania.

“We should allow Director Mueller to continue to do his job,” said Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado, who heads Senate Republicans’ campaign arm. “He should not be fired.”

“He’s doing, a fine job, Mueller is,” said outgoing Sen. Luther Strange of Alabama. “I have a lot of confidence in him.”

A few GOP senators faulted aspects of Mueller’s probe but said the investigation should be free of political interference.

“I don’t see any collusion yet, but I see an awful lot of questions about how this is being conducted,” said Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. But firing Mueller “wouldn’t be a good idea at all,” Roberts said. “He ought to have leeway that he continue his work without interference.”

“At this point, he should continue to complete his work, but it has to be an open and transparent process,” said Sen. John Hoeven of North Dakota. Hoeven said that transparency would come through congressional committees overseeing Mueller’s work.

Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska was the only GOP senator contacted by Mother Jones who declined to defend Mueller. After asserting, incorrectly, that no congressional Republicans have urged Mueller’s firing, Fischer said she had no comment on the issue but would be happy to discuss the tax bill Congress recently approved.

Meanwhile, a small but vocal chorus of Republicans has begun to push for Trump to cut Mueller loose. During a widely cited exchange at a House Judiciary Committee hearing last week, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) urged Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to “disband the special prosecutor.” Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), who is close to Trump adviser Roger Stone, has aggressively pushed Mueller’s firing in House floor speeches and elsewhere.

Recently, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has taken up the cause on Fox News. “Mueller is corrupt,” Gingrich said this month, reversing his prior praise of Mueller. “The senior FBI is corrupt. The system is corrupt.”

This was quite a reversal for Gingrich, who tweeted after Mueller’s selection in May:  

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate