Trump Is Mad About His Impulsive Decision to Meet With Kim Jong-un

And he’d really like it if the media would just stop overthinking this, ok?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A few days ago the White House along with South Korean officials announced that Kim Jong-un had invited President Donald Trump to to discuss North Korean denuclearization and that the president had accepted. This was immediately greeted with cautious optimism by many people who don’t want to die in a nuclear fire, a proposition that had grown increasingly likely over the last 16 months. 

But there were other voices too! Voices pointing out that this maybe wasn’t the big win the Trump administration thought it was. Chatting with an American president has been a goal of the North Korean regime for decades—and now Trump had given them that with nary more than a promise to “discuss” denuclearization. “Is Donald Trump the stupidest man alive?” wondered Kevin Drum. According to reports, the State Department was as surprised by the news as anyone else. It wasn’t long before many people suggested that perhaps meeting with Kim Jong-un is something that should happen at the end of a negotiation, rather than the beginning.

This was not lost on Trump, who on Saturday took to Twitter to vent.

This tweet is stupid for many reasons, the most obvious being that Trump is mad that the media took two seconds to think about whether this very big news was good or bad. How dare they!

But it’s even stupider when you realize that Trump’s own administration changed its position on the talks after spending approximately two seconds thinking about it. Here’s White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders on Friday responding to questions after a string of reports indicated that Trump was backing off the agreement to meet after being advised by the State Department that North Korea needed to meet certain preconditions before he granted Kim a high-level photo-op:

Q: Sarah, you said they promised to denuclearize. Did they promise to denuclearize or did they promise to talk about denuclearizing?

SANDERS: The understanding, the message from the South Korean delegation is that they would denuclearize. And that is what our ultimate goal has always been, and that will have to be part of the actions that we see them take.

Q: Is that before or after the meeting?

SANDERS: We’d have to see concrete and verifiable actions take place.

Q: Before the meeting?

SANDERS: Yes. Yeah.

But then the White House seemed to walk back its embarrassing yet constructive walk-back: 

Regardless, it is undeniable that the Trump administration is guilty of changing its mind about the invitation after thinking it over. This is exactly what Trump is attacking the media for doing.

Happy Saturday! Maybe that weirdo in Ohio is right

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate