Trump Announces the US Will Withdraw from the Iran Nuclear Deal

He blasted the historic accord as “defective at its core.”

Zach Gibson/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that the United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal, bashing the historic agreement brokered by the Obama administration as a “horrible, one-sided” accord. The decision comes days ahead of the May 12 deadline Trump had set for renewing the accord—which its proponents consider to have been essential to limiting Iran’s nuclear capabilities despite some imperfections—and will mark the restoration of economic sanctions against Tehran.

“The deal allowed Iran to keep enriching uranium and over time reach the brink of a nuclear breakout,” Trump said from the White House. He added, “If I allowed this deal to stand there would soon be a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.”

“We cannot prevent an Iranian nuclear bomb under the decaying and rotten structure of the current agreement,” he continued. “The Iran deal is defective at its core. If we do nothing, we know exactly what will happen.”

Trump has long complained that the 2015 deal was flawed from its inception, threatening even during the campaign to leave the agreement once he took office. Claiming that the “insane” deal does not halt Iran’s nuclear ambitions, he has incorrectly asserted that the agreement provided Iran with $150 billion “carried out in barrels.” Trump has described the money as a “slush fund” for terrorist activities; in reality, the approximately $100 billion in frozen Iranian assets was returned to the country as a part of having lifted economic sanctions.

Shortly after the announcement Tuesday, former President Barack Obama released a statement condemning the decision as “misguided,” adding that it “turns our back on America’s closest allies, and an agreement that our country’s leading diplomats, scientists, and intelligence professionals negotiated.”

“In a democracy, there will always be changes in policies and priorities from one Administration to the next,” Obama’s statement continued. “But the consistent flouting of agreements that our country is a party to risks eroding America’s credibility, and puts us at odds with the world’s major powers.”

With the deadline looming, Iranian officials spent the past several weeks warning the US against withdrawing from the agreement, saying that the US would come to regret such a move. “We have plans to resist any decision by Trump on the nuclear accord,” Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said in a live televised address Sunday. He added: “Orders have been issued to our atomic energy organization…and to the economic sector to confront America’s plots against our country.”

But on Monday, the Iranian leader appeared to strike a more optimistic tone, suggesting that Iran’s involvement in the agreement could potentially survive a US withdrawal. 

“If we can get what we want from a deal without America, then Iran will continue to remain committed to the deal,” Rouhani said. “What Iran wants is our interests to be guaranteed by non-American signatories. … Getting rid of America’s mischievous presence will be fine for Iran.”

European allies, including French President Emmanuel Macron and British Foreign Minister Boris Johnson, have urged Trump to uphold the accord. “If you just kill the JCPOA, without an option, you’ll just open a Pandora’s box,” Macron told reporters at the end of his state visit last month. Some Republicans, including the chairman of the House Armed Services, also expressed hope that the US would remain committed to the deal.

Meanwhile on social media this week, Trump appeared to be fixated with reports that former Secretary of State John Kerry has been quietly meeting with top Iranian and European officials to discuss ways to rescue the deal should the Trump administration withdraw. 

This post has been updated to include Obama’s statement.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate