Trump Slams the NYT for Reporting What a White House Official Told Them

He says the press call about North Korea didn’t happen even though it definitely did.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.Kcna/Xinhua via ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The on-again, off-again summit between the US and North Korea has caused apparent confusion within the White House, as the president and his senior staff are now saying two different things—first, about whether a meeting between the two heads of state would be productive, and then about when it might be scheduled.

On Thursday President Donald Trump canceled the summit that had been planned for June 12. He pointed to the “tremendous anger and open hostility” from the North Koreans after John Bolton, Trump’s national security adviser, suggested that the US would apply the “Libya model” in its approach to North Korea and its nuclear weapons stockpile. (He was referring to the late Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi agreeing to give up nuclear ambitions in 2003 only to be murdered by US-backed rebels in 2011.) Then Trump said that Libya was not the model for North Korean nuclear disarmament, but Vice President Mike Pence made reference to Libya again on May 21, which provoked North Korean officials to call Pence a “political dummy” and threaten a “nuclear-to-nuclear showdown.”

A day after canceling the summit, Trump told reporters that the White House was again talking to the North Koreans and that the summit might happen on June 12 after all. In describing the reversal, the New York Times cited a “senior administration official” as telling reporters that “even if the meeting were reinstated, holding it on June 12 would be impossible, given the lack of time and the amount of planning needed.”

That drew the ire of the president on Saturday who slammed the Times on Twitter: 

As pointed out by freelance journalist Yashar Ali, the official that Trump says “doesn’t exist” was actually Matt Pottinger of the National Security Council, and Pottinger’s statement was recorded (and subsequently posted by Ali). The White House routinely organizes calls during which administration officials brief the reporters on a given topic. 

The Times noted that various officials within the Trump administration have different opinions on how to address the North Korean nuclear situation. Whereas Pence and Bolton spoke publicly about decapitating the North Korean regime, Secretary of Defense James Mattis prefers diplomacy. 

Trump may be learning that resolving the North Korean situation isn’t as easy as he’d assumed. The tension between the US and North Korea is decades old and “complicated,” as this recent Mother Jones video explains:

This post has been updated to include the audio of Pottinger’s statements posted by Ali.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate