Inside the Gun Control Movement’s Push to Derail Brett Kavanaugh

The groups are requesting NRA emails and helping Democratic senators write confirmation questions.

Protesters gathered at the US Supreme Court following President Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh on Monday, July 10.Jeff Malet/Newscom via ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

When Donald Trump announced his selection of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, gun rights’ groups were quick to celebrate the president’s pick. “President Trump has made another outstanding choice in nominating Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court,” Chris Cox, the executive director of the National Rifle Association’s lobbying arm, said in a statement following Trump’s announcement on Monday night. “He has an impressive record that demonstrates his strong support for the Second Amendment.”

Kavanaugh’s record on guns aligns well with the NRA’s priorities. In a 2011 legal challenge to DC’s assault weapons ban, Kavanaugh issued a dissenting opinion that asserted assault weapons are within the scope of the Second Amendment, a move that breaks with Supreme Court precedent. And the Trump administration, too, has been a good ally to the NRA—President Trump received over $30 million in campaign support from the group, met with the NRA’s Cox at the White House in March—weeks after the February school shooting in Parkland, Florida, that left 17 dead—and spoke at the NRA’s annual convention in Dallas earlier this year.

Everytown for Gun Safety, the gun safety organization founded by billionaire and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, wants to see how deep those aligned interests go. The group tells Mother Jones that they have filed Freedom of Information Act inquiries with the offices of the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, Public Affairs and Legal Policy to locate any record of communication between Justice Department employees and the NRA surrounding Kavanaugh’s nomination or the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose vacancy made way for Kavanaugh’s nod.

“President Trump promised NRA leaders he would never let them down, and by nominating Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court he made good on that promise,” Nick Suplina, managing director for law and policy at Everytown, said in a statement. “Kavanaugh’s judicial record demonstrates a dangerous view of the Second Amendment that elevates gun rights above public safety. The American people deserve to know whether the NRA played a role in his selection.”

What the FOIA inquiries will reveal, and that information’s impact on Kavanaugh’s confirmation, remains to be seen. Freedom of Information Act inquiries can take weeks, months, or even years to return, and there’s no certainty that any communication regarding the NRA and Trump’s SCOTUS pick will be discovered. Gun safety group’s past attempts to retrieve information about the connection between the President Trump’s judicial nominations and the NRA have been met with resistance. In 2017, Giffords—the organization founded by former Arizona congresswoman and gun violence survivor Gabby Giffords—sued the Department of Justice for failing to respond to a similar request for communications between the NRA and the Trump administration during the selection of Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.

Everytown’s FOIA request is one of many tactics national gun safety groups are employing to stymy Kavanaugh’s confirmation. The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence told Mother Jones that the group is authoring a list of questions they would like Judge Kavanaugh to answer during his confirmation hearing. That list, which is still being finalized, will be shared with members of the Senate Judiciary committee, which is responsible for holding confirmation hearings and sending the nomination onto the entire Senate for a vote. The group has already setup conversations about those questions with the committee’s Democratic members. Giffords, meanwhile, has launched a digital campaign across social media that encourages voters to call their senators and ask them to vote against Kavanaugh’s confirmation, and has written a script to help them do so. The group has also implemented a phone service that automatically connects callers to their senators’ offices.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate