The Subtle Way Brett Kavanaugh Reassured Social Conservatives in His Acceptance Speech

Trump’s Supreme Court court pick shouted out a prominent DC Catholic on Monday.

Alex Edelman/CNP via ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Brett Kavanaugh’s acceptance speech Monday night contained all the trappings one would expect from a nominee to the US Supreme Court. He thanked President Trump, introduced his wife and daughters, and nodded to the influence of Anthony Kennedy, the retiring Supreme Court justice he once clerked for and hopes to eventually replace.

But, notably, Kavanaugh’s speech diverged from his predecessors in one key aspect: extensive reference to his Catholic faith, including a special shout-out to one of Washington, DC’s most beloved religious leaders, Monsignor John Enzler. 

Justice Neil Gorsuch, who attended the same Jesuit high school as Kavanaugh, vaguely thanked “my family, my friends and my faith” but failed to mention his Catholic upbringing when he accepted Trump’s nomination last year. Neither did Chief Justice John RobertsJustice Sonia Sotomayor, or Justice Clarence Thomas in their first remarks as nominees. Not even the late Justice Antonin Scalia, a proudly devout Catholic who counted a priest among his sons, mentioned religion during his swearing-in ceremony.

Kavanaugh brought up Catholicism at several points in his 857-word speech, but reserved special attention for John Enzler, known as “Father John,” a legend in DC Catholic circles. Kavanaugh said:

I am part of the vibrant Catholic community in the DC area. The members of that community disagree about many things, but we are united by a commitment to serve. Father John Enzler is here. Forty years ago, I was an altar boy for Father John. These days, I help him serve meals to the homeless at Catholic charities.

As CEO of the Archdiocese of Washington’s branch of Catholic Charities, Enzler leads relief efforts for an organization that operates 58 programs in the DC area and supplies nearly 80 percent of the beds for the city’s homeless. Catholic Charities has fans from across the political spectrum, but like many other religious institutions, it opposed the Affordable Care Act’s mandate that contraception coverage be included in health care plans for employees. In 2012, Enzler’s organization joined hundreds of other Catholic groups to sue the Department of Health and Human Services over the provision. After Trump took office, HHS settled and allowed an exception to the mandate.

Enzler, who has deep roots in the District and formerly served as pastor of the Shrine of the Most Blessed Sacrament church in the city’s wealthy upper northwest corridor, attended the White House event on behalf of Catholic Charities.

https://twitter.com/MCITLFrAphorism/status/1016491013685350406

Critics made much ado of one of Trump’s other finalists to the Court, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a former law professor at Notre Dame whose appellate confirmation hearing included an exchange about “dogma” that rocketed her to fame in the right-wing Christian world. Kavanaugh had been widely seen as a less favorable selection for social conservatives, given his positions in cases involving abortion and health care that conservatives have argued were not strong enough.

https://twitter.com/Avik/status/1012049823065956354

Trump has said he did not ask Kavanaugh about the Court’s ruling in Roe v. Wade that upheld a constitutional right to an abortion, a decision many conservatives hope will be overturned. And, as even the Vatican’s own statements have suggested, a Catholic’s allegiance to the faith is no sure sign of their allegiance to the Church’s written doctrine.

But, as Kavanaugh now heads to the Senate, controlled by a threadbare majority of Republicans, he will need to assure social conservatives that he is not a candidate to be feared. His first remarks certainly did not work against that goal. 

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate