The House Just Passed Universal Background Checks. That’s Never Happened Before.

“We’re looking forward to 2020.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) (right) kisses gun violence victim and former Rep. Gabby Giffords during a news conference to announce the introduction of legislation to expand background checks for all gun sales on January 8, 2019.Alex Brandon/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The House of Representatives passed a bill on Wednesday that would require a background check for every gun sale. This is the first time that federal legislation requiring universal background checks reached a vote in Congress. Its passage marks a historic milestone for the gun reform movement, which has fought to bring the measure to lawmakers’ attention since the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.

House Democrats were expected to unanimously support the measure, and they nearly did: Only two Democrats, freshman lawmaker Jared Golden (D-Maine) and Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) voted against the bill. But Republican support remained an open question until the vote: Democrats had touted the bill as a bipartisan measure—they even named it the “Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019”—but only five GOP lawmakers agreed to co-sponsor the legislation in advance of the vote.

And today, only a handful of Republicans joined their Democratic colleagues with a “yea” vote. In addition to the bill’s five co-sponsors—Reps. Peter King (N.Y.), Brian Fitzpatrick (Penn.), Fred Upton (Mich.), Brian Mast (Fla.), and Chris Smith (N.J.)—Reps. Vern Buchanan and Jose Diaz-Balart from Florida and Will Hurd from Texas voted yes. Those who voted to pass the legislation occupy seats in increasingly purple districts that they’ll have to fight to keep in 2020.

The bill passed with two last-minute additions: Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) added a provision that would require Immigration and Customs Enforcement to be notified when an undocumented immigrant tries to buy a gun, an addition that put Democrats, who have voiced sharp criticism of ICE, in a tough spot. An amendment from Rep. Kendra Horn (D-Okla.), which creates a background check exception for people who face risks of domestic violence and abuse, was also adopted on the floor.

Activists have lauded the vote as a marker of how much the politics of gun reform has changed. Congress hasn’t passed major gun legislation since 1994, when former President Bill Clinton signed into law bills that created the federal background check system and a temporary assault weapons ban that expired in 2004. The passage of both pieces of legislation celebrate their 25th anniversary this week, but the legacy is mixed. Democrats blamed their losses during the 1994 midterms on that vote, which scared many members of the party away from the issue.

In the wake of activism ignited by the 2018 massacre at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, Democrats made universal background checks a key plank in their platforms and won. Those victories pushed both House leadership and the freshmen Democratic lawmakers to make gun measures a top priority in the new Congress. “This is representative of how far the politics have shifted,” says Peter Ambler, the executive director of Giffords, the gun violence prevention organization founded by former Arizona congresswoman and mass shooting survivor Gabby Giffords. “Just a few years ago, you might have seen action on guns, but it wouldn’t be this quickly.”

Gun reform advocates have also been looking forward to the vote as a means of getting federal lawmakers on the record about their positions on popular gun reforms like universal background checks, which polls have repeatedly found are supported by more than 90 percent of voters. Political rewards await those who vote on the side of gun reform: Giffords is launching a five-figure digital ad buy to thank 14 freshmen Democrats who flipped Republican seats for their votes—freshmen lawmakers who will certainly face tough reelection prospects in their purple districts.

The initiative aims to hammer home these lawmakers’ commitment to a gun reform agenda, which polls have found contributed to their victory. “Their constituents are still getting to know them as members of Congress, and we want to make sure their constituents know they’re doing in Congress what they said they were going to do on the campaign trail,” Ambler says. “That’s how you build trust with an electorate.”

Everytown for Gun Safety, the gun violence prevention organization founded by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, is also planning a series of “thank you” ads as part of a $400,000 spend that the group did to encourage House members to vote in favor of the bill.

As for the vast majority of Republicans who voted against the measure, activists will not forget how they performed today. “Our record speaks for itself,” Ambler says, referring to the multimillion-dollar offensive Giffords launched during the 2018 midterms to get gun reform-minded lawmakers elected. “We have time and again held accountable Republicans who voted against the will of their constituents, against gun safety. We’re looking forward to 2020.”

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate