February 23, 2019

The Internet Can’t Stop Laughing About the Way This Senator Talked to Some Children

Sen. Dianne Feinstein wasn’t about to take any guff from Sunrise Movement activists too young to vote.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) at the Capitol on Tuesday, February 12, 2019.Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP

The internet lost its mind on Friday evening when the Sunrise Movement, a climate activism group composed of youthful volunteers working to gain support for the Green New Deal, shared a video of school-age activists visiting Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s (D-Calif.) San Francisco office to ask her to support the resolution. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has promised to hold a vote on the Green New Deal, which aims to transition the US to 100 percent renewable energy by 2030, as early as next week, a vote that is expected to divide centrists Democrats from their progressive colleagues who back the proposal.

The six-term senator who recently won reelection has her reasons for being skeptical about the Green New Deal—mainly, according to the exchange, the funding required for the plan and the ambitious 10-year timeline proposed for the transition. But her reactions to the earnest young constituents who presented her with a letter about the subject ranged from dismissive to derisive, and the encounter went viral.

One reason was Feinstein’s argument that the activists were naive and she’s not. “I’ve been doing this for 30 years,” she tells the group. “I know what I’m doing.” And just to show how much more experienced she was, she used political jargon to explain that the margin of her reelection win meant she could navigate climate policy better than they ever could. The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman couldn’t quite wrap her head around that logic:

It got worse when the activists tried to explain they are her constituents, and therefore she has to listen to them. Apparently, that all depends on how one defines “constituents.” When she learns the activists aren’t old enough to vote, she says, “Well, you didn’t vote for me.” The exchange apparently left CNN’s Rebecca Buck in tears.

Feinstein asserted that she has an alternative “responsible resolution” that would be a more effective means of combating climate change than the Green New Deal. When a protester suggested that any resolution that doesn’t take “bold, transformative action is not going to be what we need,” Feinstein shot back. “Well, you know better than I do,” she said, “so I think one day you should run for Senate, then you should do it your way.” There was a slight problem with that logic, as Varshini Prakash, the co-founder and executive director of the Sunrise Movement, noted:

Proponents of the Green New Deal and climate allies expressed outrage over Feinstein’s reaction. Longtime climate activist and 350.org founder Bill McKibben said Feinstein proved the point that Rep. Ocasio Cortez and the youth-led Sunrise Movement has been trying to make: Younger generations have to fight for climate change because the the older generations won’t.

The widely-circulated two-minute video had been edited down from a livestream the Sunrise Movement did from the office, something Feinstein defenders were quick to note. In the full 15-minute video, Feinstein does offer a tentative “yes” vote on the Green New Deal, engages the activists in a conversation about substantive climate policy and, at one point, offers one of them an internship with her office. But the tone of Feinstein’s remarks still came through in the full exchange, something New York writer Rebecca Traister noted in her defense of the internet’s outrage:

Not everyone slammed her. Right-wing commentators Ben Shapiro, Erick Erickson, and Curt Schilling set aside their party affiliations to celebrate Feinstein’s rejection of the resolution. 

But that wasn’t the end of Feinstein’s climate politics woes on Friday. Later that evening, Oil Change US, a climate advocacy group that encourages politicians to reject campaign donations from fossil fuel companies, revealed that Feinstein had broken the “No Fossil Fuel” pledge she took during her 2018 reelection campaign. According to FEC filings, Feinstein had received $12,500 from oil companies last cycle.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate