Trump’s Shocking Defense of North Korean Dictator Caps a Failed Summit

“I will take him at his word”: He blames prisons and not Kim Jong Un for an American student’s death.

Yonhap News/Newscom/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Less than two years ago, President Donald Trump helped make the name “Otto Warmbier,” the 21-year-old American college student who was taken prisoner by Kim Jong Un’s regime, synonymous with North Korean brutality.

But at the conclusion of his second summit with Kim today, he adopted the brutal dictator’s talking points when asked about Warmbier’s mysterious death in 2017.

“I don’t believe he would have allowed that to happen,” Trump said. “He tells me that he didn’t know about it and I will take him at his word.”

Warmbier was taken prisoner by Kim’s regime in early 2016 for allegedly stealing a framed propaganda poster from his hotel. Upon his return to the United States more than a year later, he was in a “vegetative state” after enduring significant brain damage, the New York Times reported. Warmbier’s parents decided to take him off a feeding tube shortly after his return. While an initial coroner’s report did not show clear signs of torture, Warmbier’s family has not been shy about pinning the blame for his treatment on Kim and North Korea writ large, where the United Nations has said torture is an “established feature of the interrogation process.”  

“They’re terrorists. They kidnapped Otto,” Warmbier’s father told Fox News in September 2017. “They tortured him. They intentionally injured him. They are not victims.”

Trump echoed that same rhetoric in a tweet claiming Warmbier was “tortured beyond belief” by Kim’s regime:

During his first State of the Union address last year, guests included North Korean defector Ji Seong-ho and Warmbier’s parents. During his speech, Trump said, “No regime has oppressed its own citizens more totally or brutally than the cruel dictatorship in North Korea.”

But all that has changed. Trump’s about-face on Warmbier’s imprisonment comes amid a broader strategic shift in how the administration has approached North Korea. After having once threatened the country with “fire and fury,” Trump has now met twice with its reclusive leader within a year. (Their latest summit this week in Hanoi ended early after Kim refused to meet US demands to destroy his nuclear weapons.) As Trump’s praise of Kim—”my friend” and a leader who “loves his people“—has ratcheted up, his once-frequent mentions of the country’s human rights record have receded.

In fact, the ghastly conditions of North Korea’s prisons were, in Trump’s telling, even more reason to believe that Warmbier’s mistreatment was a matter of circumstance rather than the result of direction from Kim. 

“Those prisons are rough. They’re rough places,” Trump said. “[Kim] knew the case very well, but he knew it later. And you got a lot of people. Big country.”

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate