The Pentagon Wants Congress to Vote on the Border Emergency With Blinders On

“You’ve had a month. I find it very hard to believe that there’s not a list.”

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Several weeks after President Donald Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border, the Pentagon still has not finalized a list of projects that will be sidelined to build his wall. Despite several requests from Congress, acting defense secretary Pat Shanahan said he will only provide a list of projects that could be affected later on Thursday, after the Senate is scheduled to vote on whether to disapprove of Trump’s declaration. 

Defense Department officials have said they intend to move $3.6 billion from the budget for military construction and $2.5 billion from a counter-narcotics account, but hardly any details have emerged about which construction programs will actually be affected. The House Democratic leaders responsible for oversight of the military and appropriations had written to Shanahan last week seeking the list of the projects involved. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) made the same request in February. The House Democrats’ deadline for Shanahan to respond was Thursday, when he testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee. 

“You’ve had a month. I find it very hard to believe that there’s not a list,” Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) told Shanahan during the hearing. “There’s no information you can give us about which construction projects are on the chopping block?”

“What I can tell you,” Shanahan replied, “is what projects aren’t on the chopping block.” He added that anything slated to begin this fiscal year or in any way associated with “family housing or barracks” will be spared. But this generally accounts for a minuscule portion of the funding obligated for military construction

Members of Congress are acutely concerned about the answers to these questions, Gordon Adams, a former defense budget official in the Clinton White House, told Mother Jones last month, because within the entire defense budget, “there is probably no part…that is more directly and concretely linked” to their interests than this one.  

Shanahan’s answer failed to satisfy King, who along with Sens. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), continued to press him and other Pentagon leaders for more clarity. 

“Well, I’m confused,” King said. “This $3.6 [billion] is coming from somewhere.”

“We don’t know which projects are going to be deferred,” acting deputy secretary David Norquist told lawmakers. Not even the $3.6 billion in military construction funds that had been widely reported in the press in the days following Trump’s declaration, is certain. “I don’t know if the secretary’s decision will be $3.6 billion,” Norquist said. “He has to determine that.” 

Because military construction projects generally receive an appropriation for up to five years, the Pentagon has some flexibility to delay projects in the earliest stage of development, especially if funds for them have not been obligated yet. Shanahan eventually promised to provide Reed with a list of un-obligated construction projects by the end of the day, but Kaine was not satisfied. 

“I feel completely sandbagged. You’re going to send it to us today after the vote on the emergency declaration?” he told Shanahan. “Your service secretaries and chiefs have had these lists and when we’ve asked them to send them to the committee, they said we can’t without the permission of [Shanahan.] Were they only available in the last half hour?”

Shanahan denied there being any “deliberate attempt to withhold information” from lawmakers, but a fired-up Tim Kaine was not having it, saying, “I don’t think you giving us that list today, after the vote, when we’ve been asking for it for a month is a good-faith response to the requests of this committee.” 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate