July 31, 2019

Warren Wins Democratic Activist Group’s Debate Straw Poll

52 percent of participants said they were most impressed with Warren’s performance on Tuesday night.

South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.), and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), participate in the first of two Democratic presidential primary debates hosted by CNN Tuesday, July 30, 2019, in the Fox Theatre in Detroit.Paul Sancya/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Democratic party’s progressive base watched two of its top-tier candidates, Sens. Bernie Sanders (Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), spar with eight other 2020 hopefuls on CNN’s debate stage on Tuesday night. According to a straw poll conducted by Indivisible, the national progressive grassroots organization founded in the wake of Donald Trump’s 2016 victory that has served as a pillar of the “resistance” movement against him ever since, Warren impressed that base the most.

The results come from a flash poll Indivisible conducted via text message at the conclusion of Tuesday night’s debate. It asked thousands of its members—more than 1 million volunteers activated after Trump’s 2016 victory who worked to flip House seats during the 2018 midterms—which candidate they’d support based on their debate performance; 52 percent said they were most impressed with Warren. Nearly 5,000 members across all 50 states responded immediately after the debate.

Warren’s standing in Tuesday night’s poll nearly matched the reception she received from Indivisible members during the first Democratic debates in Miami last month. Then, Warren faced off against former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro and New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, who came in second and third, respectively, in Indivisible’s poll.

Warren’s major moment came when she went head-to-head with former Maryland congressman John Delaney over whether some of the Democratic party’s most ambitious proposals, like Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, were unrealistic and pushed the party too far left. “I don’t understand why anybody goes to all the trouble of running for president of the United States just to talk about what we really can’t do and shouldn’t fight for,” Warren said to Delaney, a millionaire businessman who is largely self-funding his campaign for the presidency.

South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg came in second in the straw poll with 19 percent of the vote. He earned praise for his analysis that Republicans would label Democrats as “crazy socialists” regardless of the proposals they put forward. “So let’s just stand up for the right policy,” he said.

Sanders came in third, earning only 13 percent of votes from those surveyed.

This straw poll, like all others, is far from scientific. But Indivisible’s members represent a key demographic for the Democratic candidate competing in the 2020 campaign. Its members skew female, and while certainly liberal, they aren’t far-left. Their chief motivation is removing President Trump from office, not conducting progressive purity tests.

María Urbina, Indivisible’s national political director, says that the candidates’ focus on progressive policies—Medicare for All in particular—proved that liberal stances have strong salience among the Democratic electorate. “Senator Warren, Mayor Buttigieg, and Senator Sanders used the stage to push for big ideas and demonstrate why the candidates spouting Republican talking points aren’t being serious about achieving real change,” Urbina says. “Where some expected tonight to be a cage match between Warren and Sanders, it was ultimately a lesson in how progressive ideas about big structural change are the only way to beat Donald Trump.”

The group will conduct another flash poll after Wednesday night’s debate, which will feature another 10 Democratic candidates, including frontrunners Sen. Kamala Harris (Calif.) and former vice president Joe Biden. Mother Jones will have those results, as well.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate