The Guy Who’s Running Trump’s Fight to Hide Evidence Said Democrats “Hid Evidence”

White House Counsel Pat Cipollone’s stonewalling of congressional oversight has been called unprecedented.

White House counsel Pat Cipollone speaks during impeachment proceedings in the Senate on January 25, 2020.Senate Television via Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Of all the whoppers President Donald Trump’s lawyers jammed into their relatively brief launch of his defense Saturday, White House Counsel Pat Cipollone may have made the most brazen claim. Cipollone, in his opening remarks, said House impeachment managers “hid evidence” from the Senate during their three days of presenting arguments for Trump’s removal.

What he meant, ensuing arguments showed, is that Democrats did not present information that Trump’s lawyers claim exonerates the president. It is, of course, not the responsibility of prosecutors to mount a defense, nor is not mentioning something “hiding” it.

But Cipollone’s remark isn’t just wrong but a breathtaking example of hypocrisy.

This is the man who personally oversaw Trump’s complete stonewalling of the House’s impeachment inquiry. Cipollone wrote the October 11 letter, widely mocked for its partisan tone and dearth of legal reasoning, in which he flatly refused to provide any evidence the Democrats’ sought. “Trump and his Administration cannot participate in your partisan and unconstitutional inquiry under these circumstances,” he wrote. And Cipollone has overseen the administration’s battle in court to stop the House from enforcing subpoenas. This all out stonewalling of congressional oversight, which critics call unprecedented, resulted in Trump’s impeachment for obstruction of justice.

Democrats have accused Cipollone of personally hiding evidence given his “instrumental role” in Trump’s efforts to obstruct the investigation and his knowledge, as White House counsel, of concerns raised by White House aides about Trump’s conduct toward Ukraine. These factors make him a “material witness” to the charges against Trump, Democrats have argued. You must disclose all facts and information as to which you have first-hand knowledge that will be at issue in connection with evidence you present or arguments you make in your role as the President’s legal advocate,” Democratic impeachment managers wrote in a letter Tuesday to Cipollone, “so that the Senate and Chief Justice can be apprised of any potential ethical issues, conflicts, or biases.”

On Tuesday, Cipollone and his team argued in favor of a series of votes in which Senate Republicans rejected Democratic amendments that would have forced the Senate to seek documents and testimony from witnesses such as White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and former White House National Security Adviser John Bolton, who have first-hand knowledge of Trump’s actions. On Saturday, in an impressive display of chutzpah, Trump’s attorneys then cited the absence of eyewitnesses to argue for Trump’s innocence.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate