Caucus Reporting Errors Send Democrats Back to the Paper Trail

“What’s happening in Iowa is exactly why Internet voting is far from ready for prime time.”

Kevin E. Schmidt/Quad-City Times via ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Iowa Democratic Party caucus results remained unknown early into Tuesday morning, with state party officials blaming “inconsistencies” in reporting. Meanwhile precinct-based volunteers responsible for administering the contest slammed the party’s caucus-result reporting app and complained of problems they had calling numbers in for tabulation.

A state party spokesperson said the party found “inconsistencies” in numbers they were receiving from precincts and were now using “photos of results and a paper trail” to determine valid results. The statement defended the party’s software and its security, adding that it was “simply a reporting issue, the app did not go down and this is not a hack or an intrusion. The underlying paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results.”

The explanation didn’t mollify Joe Biden’s campaign. In a letter sent to the Iowa Democratic Party’s executive leadership, the former vice president’s campaign said it was clear both the app and the party’s backup phone reporting system “failed” statewide. 

“We believe that the campaigns deserve full explanations and relevant information regarding the methods of quality control you are employing, and an opportunity to respond, before any official results are released,” Dana Remus, the campaign’s general counsel, wrote in a letter.

The app was supposed to “make it easier and faster to report results from some 1,700 caucus cites,” the Wall Street Journal reported in January. Troy Price, the state party’s chair, told the paper that he was “confident in the security systems we have in place,” and several caucus organizers said they were looking forward to using it.

Shawn Sebastian, a precinct secretary from Ames, told Mother Jones late Monday night that several volunteers who were involved in running caucuses in his area had told him the weekend before the caucus “that the app was not working and I was generally given the advice to call in the results.” He added that “multiple people had tried downloading it and it didn’t work.”

In television interviews, Sebastian said he’d tried to call results in to the state party and was left on hold for more than two hours.

Alex Halderman, one of the country’s foremost election security experts, said that Iowa’s experience should be instructive to those who claim—against election security experts’ repeated warnings—that elections can be reliably and safely conducted online.

“The takeaway is that it’s a big embarrassment when a reporting system like this falls over, but we least we’ll know the result eventually,” Halderman told Mother Jones late Monday night. “Imagine if instead they were voting online, or by phone, and had similar issues?  We might never know the result, or have to scrap the whole contest and start over.”

“Complex computer systems are difficult to get right, especially when they have to be secure and they have to work at scale on one particular day,” he said. “What’s happening in Iowa is exactly why Internet voting is far from ready for prime time.”

Listen to Mother Jones’ Ari Berman and Tim Murphy discuss the fallout from the Iowa voting debacle on this week’s special early edition of the Mother Jones Podcast:

FOLLOW THE MONEY

Corporations and billionaires don’t fund journalism like ours that exists to shake things up. Instead, support from readers allows Mother Jones to call it like it is without fear, favor, or false equivalence.

And right now, a longtime friend of Mother Jones has pledged an incredibly generous gift to inspire—and double—giving from online readers. That's huge! Because you can see that our fall fundraising drive is well behind the $325,000 we need to raise. So if you agree that in-depth, fiercely independent journalism matters right now, please support our work and help us raise the money it takes to keep Mother Jones charging hard. Your gift, and all online donations up to $94,000 total, will be matched and go twice as far—but only until the November 9 deadline.

$400,000 to go: Please help us pick up the pace!

payment methods

FOLLOW THE MONEY

Corporations and billionaires don’t fund journalism like ours that exists to shake things up. Instead, support from readers allows Mother Jones to call it like it is without fear, favor, or false equivalence.

And right now, a longtime friend of Mother Jones has pledged an incredibly generous gift to inspire—and double—giving from online readers. That's huge! Because you can see that our fall fundraising drive is well behind the $325,000 we need to raise. So if you agree that in-depth, fiercely independent journalism matters right now, please support our work and help us raise the money it takes to keep Mother Jones charging hard. Your gift, and all online donations up $94,000 total, will be matched and go twice as far—but only until the November 9 deadline.

$400,000 to go: Please help us pick up the pace!

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate