Republicans Face a Marjorie Taylor Greene Crisis of Their Own Making

This is what happens when one welcomes an unhinged QAnon supporter into Congress.

Erin Scott/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In the past 24 hours, a trove of old social media posts has come back to haunt first-term Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene.

There’s her repeated support for Facebook content calling for the execution of prominent Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. “A bullet to the head would be quicker” read one January 2019 post uncovered by CNN, a post whose commenters described methods of eliminating the top Democrat.

In April 2018, when someone asked, “Now do we get to hang them ?? Meaning H & O,” a reference to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, Greene responded: “Stage is being set. Players are being put in place. We must be patient. This must be done perfectly or liberal judges would let them off.”

Media Matters also resurfaced Facebook activity wherein Greene supported a conspiracy theory claiming that Clinton had been caught “filleting a child’s face“— an allusion to a baseless, unhinged conspiracy known as “Frazzledrip.”

Then, on Wednesday morning, Fred Guttenberg, the Parkland father and gun control activist, posted a video showing Greene taunting David Hogg, a student survivor of the Parkland shooting. “Why are you supporting red-flag gun laws that attack our Second Amendment rights,” Greene says as she follows Hogg down the street. “And why are you using kids as a barrier? Do you not know how to defend your stance?” She goes on to call Hogg a “coward,” and falsely accuses him of being paid by liberals and George Soros. 

All of this has left Republicans suddenly disavowing Greene. “These comments are deeply disturbing and Leader McCarthy plans to have a conversation with the Congresswoman about them,” Mark Bednar, a spokesman for House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said in a statement after CNN revealed that Greene had endorsed executing Democrats. That comes shortly after McCarthy mildly pushed back on Greene’s efforts to impeach Joe Biden last week, arguing that it merely wasn’t the right time to launch such a move.

Yet this is the same Kevin McCarthy, who along with Rep. Jim Jordan, warmly embraced Greene before she entered Congress—despite full knowledge of Greene supporting the exact same blend of abhorrent, dangerous nonsense and calls for violence that have emerged this week. As my colleague Ali Breland reported previously:

Even though this is a general problem for the nation, House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) doesn’t seem to mind. McCarthy’s spokesperson told reporters back in June after Politico first reported on videos of Greene saying racist comments that the congressman found them “appalling” and had “no tolerance for them.” But even with that, and Greene’s clear association with QAnon, in the final weeks of the race McCarthy seemed to treat her like any other candidate. He had several conversations with Green and her top rival, with his spokesperson telling Politico McCarthy had a “good and productive” relationship with both and would remain neutral in the contest.

You can expect McCarthy and others to invoke the same playbook of milquetoast admonishment yet again. But it’s worth considering what the GOP risks by doing so. It’s increasingly clear that Republicans have no intention of convicting Donald Trump in the wake of the Capitol insurrection, and most of the party appears perfectly willing to maintain alliances with the worst fringes of Trumpism. If that’s the route they take, and this certainly seems to be the case, one need look no further than Greene to foretell the future of the Republican Party.

“There’s nothing she can do to lose my vote, unless she murdered a baby or something,” one Georgia Republican official told the New Yorker in October. That sounds a lot like shooting someone on Fifth Avenue, doesn’t it? 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate