Under Trump, Presidents Got More Power to Fire Agency Heads. Biden Just Used It.

Elections have consequences.

Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Friday, Joe Biden fired Social Security Commissioner Andrew Saul, a Trump administration appointee who had clashed with congressional Democrats and disability rights activists. Originally appointed by Donald Trump in 2018, Saul’s term was set to last until 2025.

Historically, heads of independent federal agencies like the Social Security Administration have been spared from being turfed out when new presidents take office. Indeed, in an interview with the Washington Post that foreshadows a potential battle over his dismissal, Saul, a former college classmate of Trump’s at the University of Pennsylvania, defended his tenure and said he still considers himself “the term-protected commissioner of Social Security.” He added that he plans to report to work on Monday.

While federal law says that the Social Security Commissioner can only be fired for cause, recent Supreme Court rulings have strengthened Biden’s ability to oust independent agency leaders as he likes. Last year, in a case brought during the Trump administration, a conservative majority of the Supreme Court ruled that Congress’ mandate that the president only be able to fire the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau “with cause”—and not “at will”—was unconstitutional. The issue arose after the Obama-appointed CFPB director, Richard Cordray, resigned to run for governor of Ohio, kicking of a complicated legal- and power- struggle over the agency’s leadership.

Under that ruling, Biden was able to replace Trump’s permanent CFPB director shortly after entering the Oval Office. Last month, the justices ruled that the president can similarly fire the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency without cause, clearing the way for Biden to quickly replace the Trump holdover leading that office. 

In the wake of Saul’s dismissal, the White House told several news outlets that his actions, including a decision to terminate the agency’s telework policy and an adversarial stance toward unions, “run contrary to the mission of the agency and the President’s policy agenda.”

The dismissal has not come free of criticism from ethics watchdogs. Walter Shaub, a former director of the executive branch’s Office of Government Ethics and a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Project on Government Oversight, said that by citing the CFPB case’s precedent, the Biden administration had “sided with Trump” and the Supreme Court’s Republican-appointed justices. “I hope the White House clarifies that the firing was for cause and not a constitutional challenge to the law requiring cause,” he tweeted.

Mitch McConnell, who never seemed too upset about Trump’s expansive use of executive authority, quickly pegged Biden’s move “an unprecedented and dangerous politicization of the Social Security Administration.” 

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate