Voting Rights Marches Draw Crowds, But They’re Losing the War

Republicans have simply been more willing to use their majorities to achieve their goals on voting.

voting rights march

Voting rights supporters rally in Washington, DC, on Saturday.Tom Williams/Congressional Quarterly via ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Saturday, the 58th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s March on Washington, thousands of supporters of voting rights held major marches in Atlanta, DC, Phoenix, and dozens of other locations across the country. On the National Mall, King’s son, Martin Luther King III, was among the marchers advocating for the Senate to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which advanced through the House on Tuesday:

It was an impressive showing, and a demonstration of just how high of a priority small-d democratic protections are to a significant section of the Democratic Party’s base. But it was also a bit of a reality check. It’s been more than eight months since the party won two special elections in Georgia, and with them full control of Congress. And roughly the same amount of time has elapsed since a failed coup attempted to overturn the results of a presidential election by variously throwing out millions of legally cast votes and threatening the national legislature itself.

In that time, as the march’s organizers note, Republicans in state capitols across the country have used Democrats’ electoral successes as an impetus to crack down on voting rights. Governors in Florida and Arizona have signed restrictive bills into law. In Texas, Democrats managed to block a quorum—and passage of a bill that would roll back voting rights—for an entire special legislative session by fleeing to Washington, DC. But eventually, enough members returned to work for a second session that the state House of Representatives was finally able to advance a voter suppression bill on Friday.

There is enthusiasm on the ground to counter the right’s undemocratic turn, but the post-January scoreboard on this is notably one-sided. And there’s an obvious explanation for why: Conservatives have simply been more willing to use their majorities to do what they want. Republicans have employed the legislative filibuster to block voting-rights bills from even coming to a final vote in the Senate—taking advantage of rules that the Democratic Senate majority could simply change if it wanted to.

After the most recent effort was blocked, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer promised to renew a voting-rights push in September, when the chamber returns from recess. The weekend’s marches show the strength of voting-rights organizing. But as Sherrilyn A. Ifill, the president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, told the New York Times recently, “We cannot litigate our way out of this and we cannot organize our way out of this.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate