This Week a Facebook Whistleblower Will Reveal Herself. The Company Is Trying to Discredit Her Claims.

Executives are pushing back on associations with the January 6 insurrection and comparisons to tobacco companies.

Jeff Chiu/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Ahead of a TV interview and a Senate hearing this week where a Facebook whistleblower will come forward, executives from the social media behemoth are mounting a counter-campaign against her allegations.

The Facebook whistleblower has been in the news, albeit anonymously, thanks to a Wall Street Journal investigation that last month revealed that she had turned over a slew of internal Facebook research to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The research showed the myriad ways in which Facebook is aware that its products harm users yet does little to stop it, prioritizing profit over human safety. The whistleblower is set to reveal her identity in an interview with CBS’s 60 Minutes on Sunday night. She’ll then testify before a Senate committee on Tuesday.

On Friday, Nick Clegg, Facebook’s vice president of policy and global affairs, sent a 1,500-word internal memo to staff in an attempt to get ahead of her interview. He wrote to staff that the whistleblower would be accusing Facebook of contributing to the January 6 storming of the US Capitol by loosening security too soon after the November election, and of stoking political polarization in the United States. The memo, which was leaked to the New York Times, vehemently denies these allegations. In a Sunday appearance on CNN’s Reliable Sources, Clegg called the notion that Facebook contributed to the January insurrection “ludicrous,” despite the fact that much of the violence that day was planned on Facebook’s platform.

One of the most explosive sets of internal documents revealed by the whistleblower shows a slide deck presenting Facebook’s own research concluding that Instagram is harmful to young people, and especially to teenage girls. The research found, for instance, that one in three teenage girls reported an increase in body image issues thanks to the social comparisons they’re exposed to for hours on the platform. The slides also note that teens on the platform blamed it for increases in anxiety and depression, and that 13 percent of suicidal British teen users and 6 percent of American ones blamed Instagram for their desire to kill themselves.

Since the WSJ made the whistleblower’s Facebook documents public, multiple lawmakers have accused the company of replicating the playbook of tobacco companies, who for years knew their products were deadly to consumers, but hid those facts in service of continuing to sell cigarettes.

The revelations about Facebook’s Instagram research led to a Senate subcommittee hearing this week about Instagram’s impact on teen mental health, where senators grilled Antigone Smith, Facebook’s global head of safety, and returned to the cigarettes comparison again and again.

“Facebook is just like Big Tobacco, pushing a product that they know is harmful to the health of young people, pushing it to them early, all so Facebook can make money,” Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said at the hearing

“In truth, Facebook has taken Big Tobacco’s playbook,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). “It has hidden its own research on addiction and the toxic effects of its products.”

On CNN on Sunday, host Brian Stelter reiterated this criticism, saying that he felt like he was interviewing the head of a tobacco company, and asked Clegg to respond to these proliferating comparisons.

“I think they’re profoundly false,” he answered. “I don’t think it’s remotely like tobacco…There has to be a reason that a third of the world’s population enjoys using these apps. They do it because they like exchanging their views, their feelings, and their experiences.”

THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

At least we hope they will, because that’s our approach to raising the $350,000 in online donations we need right now—during our high-stakes December fundraising push.

It’s the most important month of the year for our fundraising, with upward of 15 percent of our annual online total coming in during the final week—and there’s a lot to say about why Mother Jones’ journalism, and thus hitting that big number, matters tremendously right now.

But you told us fundraising is annoying—with the gimmicks, overwrought tone, manipulative language, and sheer volume of urgent URGENT URGENT!!! content we’re all bombarded with. It sure can be.

So we’re going to try making this as un-annoying as possible. In “Let the Facts Speak for Themselves” we give it our best shot, answering three questions that most any fundraising should try to speak to: Why us, why now, why does it matter?

The upshot? Mother Jones does journalism you don’t find elsewhere: in-depth, time-intensive, ahead-of-the-curve reporting on underreported beats. We operate on razor-thin margins in an unfathomably hard news business, and can’t afford to come up short on these online goals. And given everything, reporting like ours is vital right now.

If you can afford to part with a few bucks, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones with a much-needed year-end donation. And please do it now, while you’re thinking about it—with fewer people paying attention to the news like you are, we need everyone with us to get there.

payment methods

THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

At least we hope they will, because that’s our approach to raising the $350,000 in online donations we need right now—during our high-stakes December fundraising push.

It’s the most important month of the year for our fundraising, with upward of 15 percent of our annual online total coming in during the final week—and there’s a lot to say about why Mother Jones’ journalism, and thus hitting that big number, matters tremendously right now.

But you told us fundraising is annoying—with the gimmicks, overwrought tone, manipulative language, and sheer volume of urgent URGENT URGENT!!! content we’re all bombarded with. It sure can be.

So we’re going to try making this as un-annoying as possible. In “Let the Facts Speak for Themselves” we give it our best shot, answering three questions that most any fundraising should try to speak to: Why us, why now, why does it matter?

The upshot? Mother Jones does journalism you don’t find elsewhere: in-depth, time-intensive, ahead-of-the-curve reporting on underreported beats. We operate on razor-thin margins in an unfathomably hard news business, and can’t afford to come up short on these online goals. And given everything, reporting like ours is vital right now.

If you can afford to part with a few bucks, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones with a much-needed year-end donation. And please do it now, while you’re thinking about it—with fewer people paying attention to the news like you are, we need everyone with us to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate