This GOP Candidate Is the Son of a Senator and a Lobbyist. He’s Running Against the “Elites.”

Nevada’s Adam Laxalt is no one’s idea of an outsider.

Adam Laxalt

Brian Cahn/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In a speech at last month’s Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando, Nevada Republican Senate candidate Adam Laxalt offered an unusual theory about the biggest news story in the world. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, he argued, was in part a response to the failure of American “elites” to end drug trafficking or stand up to movements such as Black Lives Matter.

“If you attack your country, if your elites do not believe in our nation, and they tell the rest of the world that we are flawed and we are damaged, what do you think that tells Vladimir Putin?” Laxalt asked. “It tells him it’s the time to march. And that America will not be strong enough to stand up. The West will not be strong enough to stand up. And now we have the Ukrainian invasion in the last 48 hours.”

Attacking “elites” is a cliche among political candidates, but coming from Laxalt, a leading contender to take on Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto in one of the year’s most important Senate races, the term is, well, a little rich. 

His grandfather, Paul Laxalt, was a Nevada governor and US senator who started a lobbying firm called the Paul Laxalt Group. His father was the late New Mexico Sen. Pete Domenici. His mother, Michelle Laxalt, was a US Senate staffer who opened her own lobbying firm called Laxalt Corporation. Adam Laxalt graduated from a posh prep school in Alexandria, Virginia, and has two degrees from Georgetown. He co-chaired Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign in Nevada. According to his financial disclosure, he’s made millions of dollars at a Washington, DC–based law firm, which he joined fresh from serving as Nevada’s attorney general. There aren’t many definitions of “elites” in the context of American power and politics that don’t include people like Adam Laxalt. He is sort of the archetype of what he’s railing against.

But Laxalt’s condemnation of elites at CPAC was not a one-off thing. He’s been talking like this since his campaign began, inveighing against the nation’s “ruling” class dozens of times in speeches and interviews. “The radical left, rich elites, woke corporations, academia, Hollywood, and the media” were “taking over America,” he warned in his launch video, and “canceling any who stand in their way.” (Hollywood had help from, among other places, the Laxalt Corporation, which took in more than $1 million from the Motion Picture Association of America to lobby members of Congress over the years.)

“The elites, they look out for each other, you know?” he said at last year’s Basque Fry, a Nevada cattle-call that hosts state Republican power players and presidential candidates and is sponsored by his political action committee. “They’re all in one club. We’re all in another club.”

His opponent, Cortez Masto, was “part of the club” and “believes what most of our ruling elite believes,” he told a veteran Nevada local news reporter a few days later. 

Laxalt liked his answer so much he recounted it again in an interview on the conservative podcast Ruthless. “I just looked at the reporter…and I just said, ‘Look, she is only a moderate in the eyes of liberal reporters and the ruling elite in Nevada.’”)

“These elites are so insulated from real people and all they care about is satisfying Hollywood and their radical, leftist supporters,” he complained to the conservative radio host Dan Mason last year.

“We’ve got the media that’s working with the Washington elites along with Big Tech and Hollywood entertainment,” Laxalt said at a campaign event in October. “Whenever they have something that they want to push on all of us, you see them hit that button and they just jam it down our throats.”

Trump went “against the orthodoxy” of “the elite Washington crowd” when he talked about securing the border as president, Laxalt told a radio host in January. Laxalt was running against “elite orthodoxy,” he said in an interview with the conservative media personality Dan Bongino last month—in case there was any confusion on the matter.

Laxalt is hardly the only conservative politician running against the tyranny of the “elites” while benefiting from all the trappings of the ruling class. Should he win in November, he’ll practically join a caucus of them. Florida Sen. Rick Scott, the richest member of the Senate, recently wrote that “the elites atop our nation’s institutions are working hard to redefine America and silence their opponents” after his proposal to raise income taxes on poor people drew criticism. Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley has trashed the “cosmopolitan elite” after stints at Stanford and Yale Law School and a Supreme Court clerkship. Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy, an Oxford-educated lawyer, has condemned the “cultured, cosmopolitan, goat’s-milk-latte-drinking, avocado toast-eating insider elite.” There are not one but two elite-bashing Republican Senate candidates who previously worked for the same Silicon Valley billionaire—Peter Thiel. And then, of course, there was the original man of the people, Trump, a Wharton-educated mogul who lived in a Manhattan tower, talked about his own IQ and pedigree, and disparaged working-class communities as “disgusting.”

On the eve of last year’s governor’s election in Virginia, as former Carlyle Group co-CEO Glenn Youngkin was poised to upset former Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe, Laxalt went on Newsmax to predict the vanquishing of a familiar villain.

“I think people are rising up, and they’re going to send a big message to our elites,” Laxalt said. 

Just, he hopes, not to all of them.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate