Trump Confused His Ex-Wife With the Rape Accuser He Called “Not My Type”

A newly unsealed deposition undermines the former president’s go-to defense against E. Jean Carroll’s rape allegation.

Donald Trump with Marla Maples—not E. Jean Carroll.Kathy Willens/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Former President Donald Trump has given many denials to writer E. Jean Carroll’s allegation that he cornered her and raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. He’s called Carroll’s story “all fiction,” “a con job,” and “a big fat hoax.”

“I know nothing about this woman,” Trump insisted in 2019, when Carroll first made her allegation public in a New York magazine article. “She’s a liar and a sick person,” he repeated recently. “She made it up probably to sell a book or for her own ego.”

Yet perhaps the most quoted of all Trump’s defenses is his insulting insistence that Carroll is “not my type,” as he told the Hill in an Oval Office interview shortly after Carroll’s story went public. The New York Times, USA Today, and many other outlets promptly ran his insult in their headlines. The Atlantic broke down the quote’s inherent misogyny: how it reduces an “unruly woman” to a sexual commodity, then dismisses her. Carroll, meanwhile, filed a defamation lawsuit over Trump’s denials, including the “not my type” quote, saying the president smeared her when he called her a liar. 

But a newly unsealed deposition from that lawsuit has thrown Trump’s “not my type” defense into question. According to the deposition transcript, when Trump was shown a picture of himself with his then-wife, Ivana Trump, talking to Carroll, Trump misidentified Carroll as his second wife, Marla Maples. 

“It’s Marla,” Trump responded when Carroll’s lawyer Roberta Kaplan presented the photo, as he pointed to Carroll.

“You’re saying Marla is in this photo?” Kaplan asked.

“That’s Marla, yeah. That’s my wife,” Trump responded.

“Which woman are you pointing to?” 

Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, broke in. “No, that’s Carroll.”

“Oh, I see,” Trump said.

“The person you just pointed to was E. Jean Carroll,” Kaplan added.

The confusion continued for a few more beats.

“That’s Carroll?” Trump asked

“That’s Carroll,” 

Earlier in the deposition, Trump said that the photo, which first came to attention in 2019 after Trump denied knowing Carroll, appeared to have been taken while greeting guests at the “receiving line” of a charity event.

We already knew that the “not my type” line is something of a knee-jerk reaction for Trump, particularly when women pose a threat to him. The former president has deployed the defense before, responding to former People magazine journalist Natasha Stoynoff’s allegations that he pushed her against the wall at Mar-a-Lago in 2005 and forced “his tongue down my throat.” (“Take a look. You take a look. Look at her. Look at her words. You tell me what you think. I don’t think so,” Trump responded.) Same with Jessica Leeds, who says he groped her on an airplane in the 1980s. (“Believe me, she would not be my first choice, that I can tell you. You don’t know. That would not be my first choice,” Trump said.) 

But now it appears that we can add the “not my type” defense, at least when it comes to Carroll, to the tally of Trump’s 30,573 “false or misleading claims” made over his four years in office.

The deposition is expected to come up in the Carroll v. Trump trial, which is scheduled to begin in April.

GREAT JOURNALISM, SLOW FUNDRAISING

Our team has been on fire lately—publishing sweeping, one-of-a-kind investigations, ambitious, groundbreaking projects, and even releasing “the holy shit documentary of the year.” And that’s on top of protecting free and fair elections and standing up to bullies and BS when others in the media don’t.

Yet, we just came up pretty short on our first big fundraising campaign since Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting joined forces.

So, two things:

1) If you value the journalism we do but haven’t pitched in over the last few months, please consider doing so now—we urgently need a lot of help to make up for lost ground.

2) If you’re not ready to donate but you’re interested enough in our work to be reading this, please consider signing up for our free Mother Jones Daily newsletter to get to know us and our reporting better. Maybe once you do, you’ll see it’s something worth supporting.

payment methods

GREAT JOURNALISM, SLOW FUNDRAISING

Our team has been on fire lately—publishing sweeping, one-of-a-kind investigations, ambitious, groundbreaking projects, and even releasing “the holy shit documentary of the year.” And that’s on top of protecting free and fair elections and standing up to bullies and BS when others in the media don’t.

Yet, we just came up pretty short on our first big fundraising campaign since Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting joined forces.

So, two things:

1) If you value the journalism we do but haven’t pitched in over the last few months, please consider doing so now—we urgently need a lot of help to make up for lost ground.

2) If you’re not ready to donate but you’re interested enough in our work to be reading this, please consider signing up for our free Mother Jones Daily newsletter to get to know us and our reporting better. Maybe once you do, you’ll see it’s something worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate