ThE sTaFf oF mOtHeR JoNeS iS vErY DiViDeD oVeR HeAdLiNe cApiTaLiZaTiOn aNd nEeDs YoUr HeLp

A bunch of head cases want your opinions on hed case.

Mother Jones illustration

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Ten years ago, a plane carrying 155 people crash-landed safely on the Hudson River, piloted down by Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger. A week later, Barack Obama became the 44th president of the United States. It was also the year Rod Blagojevich was impeached as Illinois’ governor and Sarah Palin resigned as Alaska’s. Michael Jackson—missed, mourned, his legacy debated—danced away.

There’s a reason some events endure in national memory and others fade fast, if they register at all, including the most consequential news of 2009: On October 18, the Washington Post made a shattering announcement—it was changing its headline capitalization style from title case to sentence case.

The fuss has faded, but when the Post changed “Headlines Like This” to “Headlines like this,” a clash of conventions was laid bare in its pages. The main objection to the switch was distilled in the words of one reader who pleaded with the paper to reconsider: “Please capitalize the headlines. The new format suggests to me that we should not take the article too seriously.” Because title case, by virtue of convention, is Correct. It’s Serious. It’s Credible. It conveys Doing News. In the paper’s defense, then–executive editor Marcus Brauchli answered the reader: “The new approach to headlines—so-called down-style, or lower-case…is more readable and allows us to write slightly longer headlines. The old headline style, in which most words were capitalized, was formal and just isn’t as readable.”

The Post wasn’t alone in its support for sentence case. The Los Angeles Times agreed. The Boston Globe agreed. So did the Chicago Tribune, San Francisco Chronicle, Houston Chronicle, Philadelphia Inquirer, and other papers, all lured by the imperatives of digitization. Title case was now analog. Sentence case was the new standard—at those papers and, today, at ABC News, CBS News, NBC News, CNN, Vox, Salon, and TechCrunch, whose editor-in-chief in 2016 announced the sentence-case switch by calling it “a more colloquial headline composition” that avoids the “awkward acrobatics” of title case.

Those Awkward Acrobatics Are Hard to Conquer: Title case requires contortions of capitalization that apply to the first and last words in a headline, and all nouns, verbs, adverbs, and adjectives, but not articles or conjunctions, or prepositions of three or fewer letters, with the exception of idioms like “Break Up,” and the first word after a colon, and the first word after an em dash—and the word “But.” Got that?

Some publications get it. Title case is firmly favored by the New York Times, the New Yorker, Vice, Slate, Wired, the New Republic, and the Atlantic, even though they sometimes slip up. At Mother Jones, we never misapply title case. Ever. (Except when we do.)

Since joining Mother Jones in March, I’ve been reviewing our headlines and squinting at dozens of capitalization mistakes that I can’t unsee, an industry-wide phenomenon. It’s no reflection on individual sites; it’s a symptom of style evolution and platform confusion, and it’s the subject of a bitterly brawling feud (a style skirmish) between factions of true believers on Mother Jones staff. Which should prevail?

We put this question to staff in an internal survey conducted over five days this month, with secret ballots to reduce bias. At the final hour, sentence case had eked out a 37–34 lead:

Not everyone at Mother Jones voted, and nothing in the poll’s rules prohibited backdoor campaigning or outright electioneering. One colleague emailed an entire Mother Jones department with a last-minute plea to vote sentence case. The arguments for both sides went like this:

  • Title case is preferred because it’s familiar, formal, standard, and first. It distinguishes news from noise, and journalism from everything that isn’t. It authenticates and domesticates the wilds of the internet by marking the boundary between careful reporting and bloggy rants. It compels trust, earned or assumed. It has, in a word, gravitas. Presumably.
  • Sentence case doesn’t give a rat’s ass for gravitas. It locates real gravity in the reduction of error, the improvement of consistency and readability, and the gain of shareability across platforms. Sentence case is efficient, economical, colloquial, and industry-accepted. It’s easier to get right, and it doesn’t clutch to the conventions of 20th-century newsprint.

This minor debate, in many ways, is a metaphor for our moment: Media companies are divided over what credibility looks like, even at the level of style. This isn’t a test of headlines; it’s a test of a hypothesis: To preserve an institution, you sometimes have to change the institution, even if deviation is seen as capitulation.

But which case should prevail?

Ultimately, Mother Jones headlines are for our readers. Where do you stand: “Title Case” or “Sentence case”? Many factors will determine our final decision on headline style—not just straw polls—but your opinions will be part of the discussion. Weigh in below or reach us at styleguide@motherjones.com.

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate