Can Obama Appease UN on Climate Change?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As Josh noted earlier, with climate action stalled out in the Senate, President Obama faces a difficult task Tuesday morning as he addresses the United Nations summit on climate change in New York. With hopes for a Senate cap-and-trade bill this year seriously dampened, Obama must convince world leaders that the United States can be a productive participant in treaty negotiations this fall even without a solid commitment from Congress.

The meeting, convened by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, will bring heads of state and government together to dig in on a new climate change treaty. The goal, said Ban, “is to mobilize the political will and vision needed to reach an ambitious agreed outcome based on science at the UN climate talks in Copenhagen.” It comes alongside the UN’s annual, two-week-long General Assembly, and just ahead of Group of 20 meetings in Pittsburgh on Thursday and Friday, where climate will be one of several issues on the agenda.

Many leaders—including US climate envoy Todd Stern—are now downplaying the idea that Copenhagen will lead to a final agreement, which buys the US more time to pass a bill. But even if Copenhagen is no longer seen as the final step in the process of negotiating a successor to Kyoto, UN leaders are maintaining hope that these fall summits can bring world leaders closer to agreement on issues like near-term emissions cuts for both industrialized and developing countries and the level of funding industrialized countries will devote to help poorer nations adapt to climate change and invest in clean tech. Obama’s address will likely be seen as an indicator of just how serious the administration is about pushing Congress toward action in the coming months.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate