Rohrabacher Says He’s Fine With Housing Discrimination Against Gay People

“We’ve drawn a line on racism, but I don’t think we should extend that line.”

Rep. Dana Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.)Sipa/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Channeling his inner Masterpiece Cakeshop, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, the embattled Republican congressman representing coastal Orange County, California, told a group of real estate agents last week that homeowners should be able to refuse to sell their houses to people because of their sexual orientation.

“Every homeowner should be able to make a decision not to sell their home to someone [if] they don’t agree with their lifestyle,” Rohrabacher said in a May 16 meeting with a delegation from the Orange County Association of Realtors, according to the Orange County Register.

Wayne Woodyard, a Realtor who attended the meeting, told Buzzfeed News that Rohrabacher’s comments came in response to a question asked about the Fair and Equal Housing Act, a bill that would ban housing discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Woodyard said Rohrabacher “came unglued,” and stated that he would not support the bill.

His comments cost him the support of the 1.3 million-member National Association of Realtors, which pulled its endorsement of Rohrabacher after Woodyard posted the congressman’s comments in a closed Facebook group for LGBT Realtors.

In an interview with the OC Register, Rohrabacher claimed  that he opposes housing discrimination in all forms. However, he said, “There are some fundamentalist Christians who do not approve of their lifestyle. I support their rights.” He added, “We’ve drawn a line on racism, but I don’t think we should extend that line.” He also noted that his position will “alienate a certain number of gays who think I’m anti-gay, which isn’t the case.”

“Dana’s comments are disturbing and show why we need to move Orange County forward. Hatred and bigotry have no place in America,” says Harley Rouda, one of Rohrabacher’s Democratic challengers. “This can’t be excused away by a generation gap or the Congressman’s eccentricities,” said Hans Keirstead, another Democratic candidate, in a statement. Omar Siddiqui, another candidate in the crowded Democratic field, called Rohrabacher’s comments “despicable” and “immoral.”

In a statement, the National Association of Realtors announced, “After reviewing all new, relevant information, it was determined that Rep. Rohrabacher will no longer receive support from NAR’s President’s Circle… The association’s member Code of Ethics is far ahead of Congress on gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination. We certainly hope that Congress will…support the elimination of housing discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.”

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and it's truly crunch time: About 15 percent of our yearly online giving usually comes in during the final week of the year, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain why we simply can't afford to come up short right now.

The bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. And advertising or profit-driven ownership groups will never make time-intensive, in-depth reporting viable.

That's why donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year. There is no backup to keep us going, no alternate revenue source, no secret benefactor. If readers don’t donate, we won’t be here. It's that simple.

And if you can help us out with a donation right now, all online gifts will be matched thanks to an incredibly generous matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate