The Democrats May Have a Climate Debate After All

The DNC is weighing whether to host some kind of forum for presidential candidates to dig into the climate crisis.

Sarah Silbiger/Getty

This story was originally published by HuffPost and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

The Democratic National Committee is considering a pair of resolutions on whether to host a debate of some kind devoted exclusively to climate change,  amid mounting pressure from activists who want a spotlight put on the issue. 

At an executive committee gathering in Pittsburgh on Saturday, the DNC voted unanimously to refer two proposals—one calling for an official debate on climate change, another envisioning a less formal forum—to a committee, a DNC official confirmed to HuffPost

The committee is expected to weigh the proposals and make a recommendation, on which the DNC could hold a vote on Aug. 23. 

The announcement is not quite the victory activists declared over the weekend. 

Sunrise Movement, the grassroots group that stationed protesters outside DNC headquarters in Washington for three days last week, on Sunday sent an email to supporters stating the Democrats’ main party organ agreed to vote on a resolution that would allow for a debate devoted exclusively to climate change. 

That could be the recommendation DNC’s resolutions committee makes. But the second resolution stakes out something akin to the abortion rights forum Planned Parenthood hosted last month, which 20 presidential candidates attended. 

Still, the DNC’s vote to even consider the resolutions marks a shift. Last month, DNC Chair Tom Perez rejected calls for a climate debate and even authored a Medium post defending the decision, arguing that it would favor certain candidates and open the door to a flood of issue-specific events.

Despite climate change receiving little attention in the 2016 election, Perez vowed to ensure it would be a top priority this cycle—though he did not spell out how. 

The decision put the DNC at loggerheads with activists and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, the Democrat who has made combatting climate change the core rationale for his White House candidacy and urged that a debate be scheduled on the subject. 

The push for a such a forum gained momentum last week after the first two rounds of debate featuring 20 of the party’s presidential candidates included just 15 minutes of questions on a crisis that threatens irreversible environmental destruction and displacement of potentially billions of people in the coming decades. 

Inslee has rallied 14 of his challengers in the Democratic race, including former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, to join him in urging the DNC to reverse its denial of his proposal.

“The debates last week made it crystal clear why we need a climate debate,” Stephen O’Hanlon, a Sunrise Movement spokesman, said by phone. “And the pressure’s working.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate